With the specter of the president’s extreme right-wing judge appointments approaching, congressional Republicans, led by Bill “Not First” Frist, are seeking to eliminate the long-standing tradition of the filibuster. However, Senate Democrats are reluctant to give up their one means of making the president deal with their side, so Republicans are offering a juicier prize—exchanging the filibuster for a “last man standing” drinking contest.

The filibuster, sometimes described as a congressional loophole, has long been used as a negotiation tactic by the minority party in the Senate to stall controversial votes and force compromises to the table. The drinking contest, a long-time college and unemployment staple, has traditionally been used to test the mettle of men and women and their bladder, pitting the will of the individual, minority or majority, against an opponent and several shots of potent liquor.

“The filibuster is unfair to the majority in the Senate and the American people,” said Frist, smirking just a little as he made the comment. “The Republican majority has played the system like a filthy piano to get into prominent positions, to hold majority in all the prominent positions, and it’s totally unfair this danged silly filibuster now stands in the way of us guiding the country the way the American people want it. And to those who say the fundamentalist extreme Christian right are the ones guiding us—what, you’re saying they aren’t people?”

The filibuster is a ploy in which a member of the Senate stalls a congressional vote through technical procedure, refusing to yield the floor until opponents pledge to amend bills that reach the Senate floor or, in the case of judicial nominees, bargain on the terms of nominees or forcing the majority party to nominate more moderate judges. For more information on filibusters, visit your local library, where you can rent Mr. Smith Goes to Washington and fast-forward to the final scene.

Frist claims a drinking contest is a better way to solve congressional disagreements—representatives of both parties, the best drinkers chosen from among a fine stock of drinking men, can tequila-shot their way to a decision both sides will adhere to, in a much shorter period of time than the usual filibuster, which can take many hours, and in rare turns, even days.

“Standing around all night, talking? Reading from law books, the Constitution, or even Where the Wild Things Grow?” At this Frist shook a finger and sighed. “That’s hardly a competition of wills for real men. When I really want to show who’s more resolved and dedicated to his beliefs, I like to down several shots of Southern Comfort and wobble around the Senate floor. I guarantee I can hold my own against any Democrat in congress right now. The Democrats are going to have to elect Nick Nolte or Robert Downey Jr. to give me a serious run for my money.”

While Nolte and Downey refused to comment on their futures in politics, the Senate minority leaders were more vocal.

“It is simply ridiculous, not to mention irresponsible, to legitimize drinking as a way to solve decisions,” said Sen. Edward Kennedy (D., Massachussetts). “And if Frist really thinks he can outdrink me, he knows where my office is. I’ll give him a five-shot headstart. Bring it on, lightweight.”